Maine State Bar
Justia Lawyer Rating
National College for DUI Defense
National College for DUI Defense
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Martindale-Hubbell
Avvo
MTLA
AV Preeminent

OUI-300x200If you get a DUI it is very important that you get a good DUI lawyer right away.  If you wait, the chances of losing the case and losing your license get much, much worse.  You may lose the chance to fight your license suspension if you wait too long.  Equally as bad, critical evidence may be destroyed – that’s evidence you need to win.

Most states have a procedure that suspends your license for DUI or refusing a test BEFORE your court date.  In some states the police take your license when they arrest you.  In other states the Motor Vehicles department gets notice from the police about the DUI.  Motor Vehicles then sends you notice of suspension that your license will be suspended soon.  You have a right to fight this suspension, no matter which way they do it.  But that right requires you to tell Motor Vehicles you want to fight it.  The time to let them know is limited.  In my state, Maine, you have ten days from the date of suspension to challenge the suspension.  If you don’t file your challenge within those ten days, you can never challenge it.

Evidence you need to win your case may be lost if you don’t take steps to save it.  Police video cameras record to hard drives.  After a couple of weeks many of those hard drives start to record over the old recordings.  Unless you put the police on notice that you want the video saved, you may LOSE IT FOREVER.  That video may be the only evidence you have to prove the cop wrong.  If there is no video it is your word against the cop’s word.  Who do you think they will believe?

by
Published on:
Updated:

guns-300x225In yesterday’s paper there was an article about a shooting in Mt. Rainier National Park.  There was a tragedy in the park.  A young man, believed to be Benjamin Colton Barnes,  had severe mental problems – possibly PTSD from service in Iraq.  He shot several people near Seattle on New year’s Eve.  He may also have been involved in another shooting incident that night.  On New Year’s Day Barnes he fled to Mt. Rainier National Park.

Park police had a checkpoint set up to make sure people had chains because of the snowy conditions in the park.  Someone blew through that checkpoint.  One of the rangers followed that person.  Another ranger, Margaret Anderson, set up a roadblock to stop the person who ran the checkpoint.  As she was getting out of a vehicle she was shot and killed.  Police believe Barnes was the shooter.  Barnes was later found dead in the Park.  The cause of death is believed to be hypothermia – he was  found in a snowy stream in a T-shirt and jeans.

Before Barnes was found dead, rangers had rounded up all of the park visitors and evacuated them.  They were afraid for their safety.  Afraid that Barnes would try to kidnap or harm some of them.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Defense Attorney: John Scott Webb, Esq.

Offense: Gross Sexual Assault, Class A, 32 Counts; Unlawful Sexual Contact, Class C, 33 Counts

Maximum Sentence: 30 years with respect to each Class A Count; 5 Years with respect to each Class C Count; (a total of 1,125 years)

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Defense Attorney: John Scott Webb, Esq.

Offense: Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI)

Maximum Sentence: 364 days in jail

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Defense Attorney: John Scott Webb, Esq.

Offense: Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI)

Maximum Sentence: 364 days in jail

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

Defense Attorney: John Scott Webb, Esq.

Offense: Operating Under the Influence (OUI, DUI, DWI)

Maximum Sentence: 364 days in jail (minimum 90 day license suspension, $500.00 fine)

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

So what does the Supreme Court’s decision in Bullcoming v. New Mexico mean for the country at large? The answer is that no longer can scientific evidence be introduced into a case as if it were non-testimonial evidence. Testing and subsequent analysis of forensic evidence, far from being rote, requires a level of scientific expertise that, on occasion, may come into question. It is therefore imperative that whoever performs testing on any manner of sample must be made available for testimony so that the accuracy and reliability of the conclusions may be fully investigated. Although this doesn’t pose much of a problem for us here in Maine, many larger states may find themselves in a predicament now that highly technical and crucial forensic evidence can not be presented to the court as though it was generated by some nameless pencil-pusher.

by
Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

no-drink-drive-220x300I cannot tell you the number of people I talk to who say, “Well, the breath test says I blew over .08, so there is nothing I can do, right?” Wrong! What most people do not understand is that breath tests do not measure your blood alcohol level. Breath tests estimate your blood-alcohol level. They do that by using a lot of assumptions that assume everyone is the same. Do you really think everyone is the same? Hint: the answer is “no.”

This is Part I of a series of blogs about the assumptions that form the basis of breath testing, and why those assumptions are flawed. A breath test can be off, way off. While they are right much of the time, they are unfortunately wrong at the wrong times. As a result, innocent people are convicted of DUI.

I will start with explaining how breath testing is supposed to work. After that I will talk about the problems that occur. If there is something particular any reader would like me to comment on about breath testing, please let me know.

Contact Information